The Republican Study Committee, an
influential group of House conservatives, called it “a Republican welfare
entitlement.” Conservative advocacy group FreedomWorks, a major force on
the right, put it simply: “This is ObamaCare-lite.”
Over at Breitbart News, the
lodestar of the Trump administration, readers variously dubbed it “Ryancare,”
“Obamacare 2.0,” “Soroscare” or, for the wonks, “unEarned Income Tax Credit
II.”
The brewing conservative opposition to
House Speaker Paul Ryan’s reform of the Affordable Care Act centers on what
Ryan calls “advanceable refundable tax credits” that could be used to subsidize
the purchase of health insurance.
Conservatives are making the case ―
quite accurately ― that such a payment is, in principle, no different than the
subsidies already created by the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare.
For a campaign based on principle, that’s a devastating critique.
The only difference, in the end, is
that Ryan’s subsidies are smaller than those in the current health care law.
“Writing checks to individuals to purchase insurance is, in principle,
Obamacare,” concludes an RSC staff report obtained by The Huffington Post and
first reported by Bloomberg.
At its heart, Ryan’s health care plan
cuts taxes for the wealthy by hundreds of billions of dollars. It does so by
raiding Medicaid, a health care program that is popularly understood to benefit
the poor but is also a lifeline to many elderly people. The bill also helps
fund the tax cuts by raising the cost of health coverage for those over the age
of 55 and those with pre-existing conditions.
But conservatives warn that the
Medicaid cuts aren’t real. Ryan’s plan delays unwinding Medicaid expansion by
several years, which would put the onus on a future Congress to suffer the
pain.


No comments:
Post a Comment